Divorce Property Settlements: What happens if you brought more assets into the relationship?

Evaluating contributions in family law property settlements can be quite complex. In Australia, courts typically assess both financial and non-financial contributions made by each party during the relationship. Over the years, the law surrounding contributions has evolved, particularly with the introduction of the Springboard Principle and a more holistic approach to property division.

As one of Perth’s leading family law and divorce lawyers, we stay up to date with the latest legal developments to provide clients with tailored advice and comprehensive support. It is essential to understand that the following information reflects the legal landscape at the time of writing, and every case is different. Therefore, obtaining tailored legal advice is critical for your specific situation.

Below is a small overview of some of the many considerations requiring contemplation when assessing your circumstances.

The Springboard Principle in Family Law

The Springboard Principle relates to initial financial contributions made by one party at the beginning of the relationship, such as owning property, running a business, or having significant savings. These contributions can ‘springboard’ the couple’s financial position over time. Courts examine how to treat these contributions, particularly in divorce property settlements. While earlier decisions had favoured giving significant weight to initial contributions, recent trends show a shift towards a more balanced approach.

Courts have recognised initial business contributions as instrumental in asset accumulation. However, more recent rulings indicate a shift away from this approach, acknowledging the need to balance initial contributions with later contributions made throughout the relationship.

The Holistic Approach to Contributions

The courts have increasingly adopted a holistic approach when assessing contributions, considering both financial and non-financial factors throughout the relationship. This approach often gives more weight to non-financial contributions, such as homemaking and child-rearing. Courts are also moving away from the ‘Erosion Principle’, which diminished the weight of early contributions over time.

This approach was highlighted when the court emphasised a holistic evaluation of contributions, declining to treat significant financial growths as sole financial contributions. This forms part of a broader trend to reject the Erosion Principle in favour of considering the relationship as a whole.

Recent Trends in Family Law

Recent cases highlight the ongoing shift towards balancing financial and non-financial contributions in divorce property settlements. Courts have reinforced the notion that all contributions, whether financial or non-financial, are critical in determining a fair property settlement.

This trend reflects a broader movement towards a more holistic and equitable view of relationships, recognising both parties’ roles—whether as financial providers or homemakers—as equally important.

Why Tailored Legal Advice is Essential

It’s important to note that every family law divorce or property settlement is unique, and the principles outlined here represent general legal trends as they stand today. The outcome of your case will depend on your specific circumstances, and as such, it is important to obtain tailored legal advice.

At Loukas Law Family and Divorce Lawyers Perth, we specialise in providing personalised legal advice in family law matters, including property settlements, divorce, and spousal maintenance. Our experienced team will assess your case, explain your legal rights, and guide you through the process to ensure the best possible outcome.

To arrange a confidential consultation with one of our experienced family lawyers, contact Loukas Law today. We are committed to helping you navigate this challenging time with expert advice and compassionate support.

Posted in: Property & Financial